H.J.Res.39 — Disapproving the rule submitted by the Department of Commerce relating to "Procedures Covering Suspension of Liquidation, Duties and Estimated Duties in Accord With Presidential Proclamation 10414".
House Roll Call
H.J.Res.39
| Bill | H.J.Res.39 — Disapproving the rule submitted by the Department of Commerce relating to "Procedures Covering Suspension of Liquidation, Duties and Estimated Duties in Accord With Presidential Proclamation 10414". |
|---|---|
| Vote question | On Passage |
| Vote type | Yea-and-Nay |
| Result | Passed |
| Totals | Yea 221 / Nay 202 / Present 0 / Not Voting 12 |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| R | 209 | 8 | 0 | 5 |
| D | 12 | 194 | 0 | 7 |
| I | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Research Brief
On Passage
Bill Analysis
HJRES 39 is a joint resolution introduced in the 118th Congress aimed at disapproving a specific rule established by the Department of Commerce. This rule pertains to the procedures for the suspension of liquidation, duties, and estimated duties in accordance with Presidential Proclamation 10414. The proclamation itself relates to the imposition of tariffs on certain imports, particularly those that may impact national security or economic interests.
The resolution seeks to nullify the Department of Commerce’s rule, which outlines how the agency will manage the suspension of liquidation of duties on affected imports. This process is crucial for importers as it determines the timing and amount of duties they must pay, impacting their financial obligations and competitive positioning in the market.
The agencies primarily affected by this resolution are the Department of Commerce and U.S. Customs and Border Protection, which administers the collection of tariffs and duties. If passed, HJRES 39 would prevent the implementation of the disputed rule, potentially altering the enforcement of tariffs established under Proclamation 10414.
The stakeholders who would benefit from this disapproval include importers and businesses that rely on imported goods, particularly those who may be adversely affected by the existing tariff procedures. Conversely, the resolution could be viewed as a regulatory relief for these entities, allowing for more favorable conditions in international trade.
Key timelines for this resolution include its introduction in the House and subsequent actions leading to its notification to the Senate. The resolution’s progress will depend on further legislative action, including potential debates and votes in both chambers of Congress. If passed by both the House and Senate, it would be sent to the President for approval or veto.
Yea (221)
K
Kelly Armstrong
D
Dan Bishop
K
Ken Buck
L
Larry Bucshon
M
Michael Burgess
K
Ken Calvert
J
Jerry Carl
L
Lori Chavez-DeRemer
J
John Duarte
J
Jeff Duncan
A
A. Ferguson
S
Scott Franklin
M
Matt Gaetz
M
Mike Gallagher
J
John Garamendi
M
Mike Garcia
B
Bob Good
K
Kay Granger
G
Garret Graves
M
Mark Green
B
Bill Johnson
D
Daniel Kildee
D
Doug Lamborn
J
Jake LaTurner
D
Debbie Lesko
B
Blaine Luetkemeyer
K
Kevin McCarthy
L
Lisa McClain
P
Patrick McHenry
A
Alexander Mooney
B
Bill Pascrell
G
Greg Pence
B
Bill Posey
C
Cathy Rodgers
M
Matthew Rosendale
J
John Rutherford
G
George Santos
D
David Schweikert
P
Pete Sessions
M
Michelle Steel
C
Chris Stewart
M
Michael Waltz
B
Brad Wenstrup
B
Brandon Williams
Nay (202)
C
Colin Allred
E
Earl Blumenauer
J
Jamaal Bowman
C
Cori Bush
Y
Yadira Caraveo
T
Tony Cárdenas
M
Matt Cartwright
D
David Cicilline
G
Gerald Connolly
J
Jason Crow
A
Anthony D'Esposito
L
Lloyd Doggett
A
Anna Eshoo
R
Ruben Gallego
R
Raúl Grijalva
B
Brian Higgins
J
Jeff Jackson
S
Sheila Jackson Lee
D
Derek Kilmer
A
Ann Kuster
B
Barbara Lee
K
Kathy Manning
L
Lucy McBath
M
Marcus Molinaro
G
Grace Napolitano
W
Wiley Nickel
D
Donald Payne
M
Mary Peltola
D
Dean Phillips
K
Katie Porter
C
C. Ruppersberger
J
John Sarbanes
A
Abigail Spanberger
E
Eric Swalwell
R
Rashida Tlaib
D
David Trone
N
Nydia Velázquez
D
Debbie Wasserman Schultz
J
Jennifer Wexton
S
Susan Wild
