House Roll Call

H.R.1398

Roll 413 • Congress 118, Session 2 • Sep 11, 2024 5:19 PM • Result: Passed

← Back to roll call listView bill pageClerk recordAPI source

BillH.R.1398 — Protect America’s Innovation and Economic Security from CCP Act of 2024
Vote questionOn Passage
Vote typeYea-and-Nay
ResultPassed
TotalsYea 237 / Nay 180 / Present 0 / Not Voting 14
PartyYeaNayPresentNot Voting
R214006
D2318008
I0000

Research Brief

On Passage

Bill Analysis

Bill Summary: HR 1398 - Protect America’s Innovation and Economic Security from CCP Act of 2024

The Protect America’s Innovation and Economic Security from CCP Act of 2024 (HR 1398) aims to enhance national security by addressing threats posed by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) to U.S. technological innovation and economic stability. The bill establishes a framework to prevent the transfer of sensitive technologies and intellectual property to entities linked to the CCP.

Key Provisions:

  1. Technology Transfer Restrictions: The bill mandates the Department of Commerce to create a list of technologies and sectors deemed critical to national security. It prohibits U.S. companies from transferring these technologies to foreign entities associated with the CCP without explicit government approval.

  2. Investment Review Process: HR 1398 expands the authority of the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS) to review foreign investments in U.S. companies, particularly those in sensitive sectors. This includes a focus on investments that could lead to the acquisition of critical technologies.

  3. Funding and Resources: The bill authorizes appropriations to strengthen the capabilities of CFIUS and the Department of Commerce in monitoring and enforcing compliance with the new regulations. Specific funding levels are not detailed in the text but are expected to be significant to ensure effective implementation.

  4. Collaboration with Allies: The legislation encourages collaboration with international allies to establish a unified front against CCP influence in technology sectors, promoting joint efforts in research and development.

Beneficiaries and Affected Entities: The bill primarily benefits U.S. technology firms, defense contractors, and national security agencies by safeguarding their innovations. It also aims to protect consumers and the economy from potential espionage and economic coercion.

Key Timelines: Following its introduction, HR 1398 has been received in the Senate, read twice, and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary for further consideration. The timeline for potential amendments, debates, and votes in the Senate remains to be determined.

In summary, HR 1398 seeks to fortify U.S. economic security against CCP threats through stringent controls on technology transfer and foreign investments, while enhancing interagency collaboration and international partnerships.

Yea (237)

K
Kelly Armstrong

ND • R • Yea

D
Dan Bishop

NC • R • Yea

L
Larry Bucshon

IN • R • Yea

M
Michael Burgess

TX • R • Yea

K
Ken Calvert

CA • R • Yea

Y
Yadira Caraveo

CO • D • Yea

J
Jerry Carl

AL • R • Yea

M
Matt Cartwright

PA • D • Yea

L
Lori Chavez-DeRemer

OR • R • Yea

A
Anthony D'Esposito

NY • R • Yea

J
John Duarte

CA • R • Yea

J
Jeff Duncan

SC • R • Yea

A
A. Ferguson

GA • R • Yea

M
Matt Gaetz

FL • R • Yea

R
Ruben Gallego

AZ • D • Yea

M
Mike Garcia

CA • R • Yea

B
Bob Good

VA • R • Yea

G
Garret Graves

LA • R • Yea

M
Mark Green

TN • R • Yea

D
Doug Lamborn

CO • R • Yea

J
Jake LaTurner

KS • R • Yea

D
Debbie Lesko

AZ • R • Yea

G
Greg Lopez

CO • R • Yea

B
Blaine Luetkemeyer

MO • R • Yea

L
Lisa McClain

MI • R • Yea

P
Patrick McHenry

NC • R • Yea

M
Marcus Molinaro

NY • R • Yea

A
Alexander Mooney

WV • R • Yea

G
Greg Pence

IN • R • Yea

B
Bill Posey

FL • R • Yea

C
Cathy Rodgers

WA • R • Yea

M
Matthew Rosendale

MT • R • Yea

J
John Rutherford

FL • R • Yea

D
David Schweikert

AZ • R • Yea

P
Pete Sessions

TX • R • Yea

M
Michelle Steel

CA • R • Yea

E
Eric Swalwell

CA • D • Yea

M
Michael Waltz

FL • R • Yea

B
Brad Wenstrup

OH • R • Yea

S
Susan Wild

PA • D • Yea

B
Brandon Williams

NY • R • Yea

Nay (180)

C
Colin Allred

TX • D • Nay

E
Earl Blumenauer

OR • D • Nay

J
Jamaal Bowman

NY • D • Nay

C
Cori Bush

MO • D • Nay

T
Tony Cárdenas

CA • D • Nay

G
Gerald Connolly

VA • D • Nay

J
Jason Crow

CO • D • Nay

L
Lloyd Doggett

TX • D • Nay

A
Anna Eshoo

CA • D • Nay

J
Jeff Jackson

NC • D • Nay

D
Daniel Kildee

MI • D • Nay

D
Derek Kilmer

WA • D • Nay

A
Ann Kuster

NH • D • Nay

B
Barbara Lee

CA • D • Nay

K
Kathy Manning

NC • D • Nay

L
Lucy McBath

GA • D • Nay

G
Grace Napolitano

CA • D • Nay

W
Wiley Nickel

NC • D • Nay

D
Dean Phillips

MN • D • Nay

K
Katie Porter

CA • D • Nay

C
C. Ruppersberger

MD • D • Nay

J
John Sarbanes

MD • D • Nay

A
Abigail Spanberger

VA • D • Nay

R
Rashida Tlaib

MI • D • Nay

D
David Trone

MD • D • Nay

N
Nydia Velázquez

NY • D • Nay

D
Debbie Wasserman Schultz

FL • D • Nay

Not Voting (14)

S
Scott Franklin

FL • R • Not Voting

J
John Garamendi

CA • D • Not Voting

K
Kay Granger

TX • R • Not Voting

R
Raúl Grijalva

AZ • D • Not Voting

M
Mary Peltola

AK • D • Not Voting

J
Jennifer Wexton

VA • D • Not Voting