H.Res.1065 — Denouncing the Biden administration's immigration policies.
House Roll Call
H.Res.1065
| Bill | H.Res.1065 — Denouncing the Biden administration's immigration policies. |
|---|---|
| Vote question | On Agreeing to the Resolution |
| Vote type | Yea-and-Nay |
| Result | Passed |
| Totals | Yea 226 / Nay 193 / Present 0 / Not Voting 13 |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| R | 212 | 0 | 0 | 7 |
| D | 14 | 193 | 0 | 6 |
| I | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Research Brief
On Agreeing to the Resolution
Bill Analysis
Bill Summary: HRES 1065 (118th Congress)
HRES 1065 is a resolution introduced in the House of Representatives aimed at formally denouncing the immigration policies implemented by the Biden administration. The resolution articulates concerns regarding the perceived inadequacies and negative impacts of these policies on national security, border control, and the overall immigration system.
Key Provisions: The resolution does not allocate funding or establish new authorities; instead, it serves as a formal statement of disapproval. It highlights specific issues such as increased illegal border crossings, the handling of asylum claims, and the management of immigration enforcement resources. The resolution positions these policies as contributing to a crisis at the southern border, arguing that they undermine the rule of law and public safety.
Agencies Affected: The resolution indirectly impacts several federal agencies involved in immigration enforcement and policy, including the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP), and U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). By criticizing the current administration’s approach, the resolution may influence future legislative and administrative actions regarding immigration enforcement and policy reform.
Beneficiaries and Regulation: The resolution primarily benefits those advocating for stricter immigration controls and enforcement, including certain lawmakers, border security advocates, and constituents concerned about immigration issues. It does not create regulations but seeks to shape the political discourse surrounding immigration policy.
Key Timelines: The latest action on HRES 1065 involved a motion to reconsider, which was laid on the table and agreed to without objection, indicating a lack of further debate or opposition at that time. This procedural step suggests that the resolution has reached a point of consensus among members, effectively concluding its immediate legislative journey.
In summary, HRES 1065 serves as a symbolic condemnation of the Biden administration’s immigration policies, reflecting ongoing partisan divisions over immigration management in the U.S.
Yea (226)
K
Kelly Armstrong
D
Dan Bishop
K
Ken Buck
L
Larry Bucshon
M
Michael Burgess
K
Ken Calvert
Y
Yadira Caraveo
J
Jerry Carl
L
Lori Chavez-DeRemer
A
Anthony D'Esposito
J
John Duarte
J
Jeff Duncan
A
A. Ferguson
S
Scott Franklin
M
Mike Gallagher
M
Mike Garcia
B
Bob Good
K
Kay Granger
G
Garret Graves
M
Mark Green
D
Doug Lamborn
J
Jake LaTurner
D
Debbie Lesko
B
Blaine Luetkemeyer
L
Lisa McClain
M
Marcus Molinaro
A
Alexander Mooney
M
Mary Peltola
G
Greg Pence
B
Bill Posey
C
Cathy Rodgers
M
Matthew Rosendale
J
John Rutherford
D
David Schweikert
P
Pete Sessions
M
Michelle Steel
M
Michael Waltz
B
Brad Wenstrup
B
Brandon Williams
Nay (193)
C
Colin Allred
E
Earl Blumenauer
J
Jamaal Bowman
C
Cori Bush
T
Tony Cárdenas
M
Matt Cartwright
G
Gerald Connolly
J
Jason Crow
L
Lloyd Doggett
A
Anna Eshoo
R
Ruben Gallego
J
John Garamendi
J
Jeff Jackson
S
Sheila Jackson Lee
D
Daniel Kildee
D
Derek Kilmer
A
Ann Kuster
B
Barbara Lee
K
Kathy Manning
L
Lucy McBath
G
Grace Napolitano
W
Wiley Nickel
B
Bill Pascrell
D
Donald Payne
D
Dean Phillips
K
Katie Porter
C
C. Ruppersberger
J
John Sarbanes
A
Abigail Spanberger
E
Eric Swalwell
R
Rashida Tlaib
D
David Trone
N
Nydia Velázquez
D
Debbie Wasserman Schultz
J
Jennifer Wexton
S
Susan Wild
Not Voting (13)
M
Matt Gaetz
R
Raúl Grijalva
P
Patrick McHenry
