House Roll Call

H.J.Res.89

Roll 112 • Congress 119, Session 1 • Apr 30, 2025 5:49 PM • Result: Passed

← Back to roll call listView bill pageClerk recordAPI source

BillH.J.Res.89 — Providing congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Environmental Protection Agency relating to "California State Motor Vehicle and Engine and Nonroad Engine Pollution Control Standards; The 'Omnibus' Low NOX Regulation; Waiver of Preemption; Notice of Decision".
Vote questionOn Passage
Vote typeYea-and-Nay
ResultPassed
TotalsYea 225 / Nay 196 / Present 0 / Not Voting 12
PartyYeaNayPresentNot Voting
R215104
D1019508
I0000

Research Brief

On Passage

Bill Analysis

HJRES 89, introduced in the 119th Congress, is a joint resolution that disapproves a specific rule issued by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) concerning California’s motor vehicle and engine pollution control standards. This rule pertains to the “Omnibus” Low NOX Regulation, which aims to reduce nitrogen oxides (NOx) emissions from vehicles and nonroad engines, thereby addressing air quality and public health concerns.

The resolution invokes the Congressional Review Act (CRA), which allows Congress to overturn federal regulations. By passing HJRES 89, Congress effectively nullifies the EPA’s decision to grant California a waiver of preemption under the Clean Air Act, enabling the state to implement its stringent emissions standards. This disapproval affects California’s authority to enforce its pollution control measures, which are often more rigorous than federal standards.

The primary agencies impacted by this resolution are the EPA and the California Air Resources Board (CARB). The disapproval may have broader implications for states seeking to adopt similar emissions standards, as it sets a precedent for federal oversight of state-level environmental regulations.

Beneficiaries of this resolution include automotive manufacturers who may face fewer regulatory burdens and compliance costs associated with California’s stringent standards. Conversely, environmental advocacy groups and public health organizations may be adversely affected, as the resolution could hinder efforts to improve air quality and reduce pollution-related health risks.

The resolution was signed into law and became Public Law No: 119-17, marking a significant legislative action against state-level environmental regulations. Key timelines include its introduction, passage through Congress, and final enactment, all of which occurred within the legislative session of 2023. The swift action reflects ongoing tensions between federal and state regulatory authority in environmental policy.

Yea (225)

K
Ken Calvert

CA • R • Yea

S
Scott Franklin

FL • R • Yea

M
Mark Green

TN • R • Yea

L
Lisa McClain

MI • R • Yea

J
John Rutherford

FL • R • Yea

D
David Schweikert

AZ • R • Yea

P
Pete Sessions

TX • R • Yea

Nay (196)

J
Jason Crow

CO • D • Nay

L
Lloyd Doggett

TX • D • Nay

J
John Garamendi

CA • D • Nay

J
John Mannion

NY • D • Nay

L
Lucy McBath

GA • D • Nay

E
Eric Swalwell

CA • D • Nay

R
Rashida Tlaib

MI • D • Nay

N
Nydia Velázquez

NY • D • Nay

Not Voting (12)

G
Gerald Connolly

VA • D • Not Voting

D
Debbie Wasserman Schultz

FL • D • Not Voting