House Roll Call

H.J.Res.88

Roll 114 • Congress 119, Session 1 • May 1, 2025 10:37 AM • Result: Passed

← Back to roll call listView bill pageClerk recordAPI source

BillH.J.Res.88 — Providing congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Environmental Protection Agency relating to "California State Motor Vehicle and Engine Pollution Control Standards; Advanced Clean Cars II; Waiver of Preemption; Notice of Decision".
Vote questionOn Passage
Vote typeYea-and-Nay
ResultPassed
TotalsYea 246 / Nay 164 / Present 0 / Not Voting 22
PartyYeaNayPresentNot Voting
R211008
D35164014
I0000

Research Brief

On Passage

Bill Analysis

HJRES 88, enacted as Public Law No: 119-16, provides congressional disapproval of a specific rule issued by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) concerning California’s motor vehicle and engine pollution control standards. This resolution targets the EPA’s decision to grant California a waiver under the Clean Air Act, allowing the state to implement its Advanced Clean Cars II program, which sets stricter emissions standards for vehicles than those mandated by federal regulations.

The bill effectively nullifies the EPA’s waiver, asserting congressional authority to disapprove the rule under Chapter 8 of Title 5 of the United States Code. This action is significant as it directly impacts California’s ability to enforce its environmental standards, which are often seen as a benchmark for other states. The resolution reflects a broader legislative effort to limit state-level environmental regulations that exceed federal standards.

The primary agencies affected by this legislation are the EPA and the California Air Resources Board (CARB), which oversees the implementation of the state’s vehicle emissions regulations. The disapproval may have implications for manufacturers of motor vehicles and engines, as they would no longer be required to meet California’s advanced standards, potentially leading to a more uniform regulatory environment across the country.

Beneficiaries of this disapproval include automobile manufacturers who may face reduced compliance costs and regulatory burdens, as well as consumers who may have access to a wider range of vehicle options without the stringent California emissions requirements. However, environmental advocates and public health proponents may view this as a setback for air quality and climate change mitigation efforts.

The resolution was introduced and passed in a relatively short timeframe, culminating in its enactment in 2023, reflecting a swift legislative response to the EPA’s regulatory actions.

Yea (246)

K
Ken Calvert

CA • R • Yea

S
Scott Franklin

FL • R • Yea

M
Mark Green

TN • R • Yea

L
Lisa McClain

MI • R • Yea

D
David Schweikert

AZ • R • Yea

P
Pete Sessions

TX • R • Yea

Nay (164)

J
Jason Crow

CO • D • Nay

L
Lloyd Doggett

TX • D • Nay

J
John Garamendi

CA • D • Nay

J
John Mannion

NY • D • Nay

L
Lucy McBath

GA • D • Nay

R
Rashida Tlaib

MI • D • Nay

N
Nydia Velázquez

NY • D • Nay

Not Voting (22)

G
Gerald Connolly

VA • D • Not Voting

J
John Rutherford

FL • R • Not Voting

E
Eric Swalwell

CA • D • Not Voting

D
Debbie Wasserman Schultz

FL • D • Not Voting