H.Res.436 — Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 1) to provide for reconciliation pursuant to title II of H. Con. Res. 14.
House Roll Call
H.Res.436
| Bill | H.Res.436 — Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 1) to provide for reconciliation pursuant to title II of H. Con. Res. 14. |
|---|---|
| Vote question | On Consideration of the Resolution |
| Vote type | Yea-and-Nay |
| Result | Passed |
| Totals | Yea 217 / Nay 211 / Present 0 / Not Voting 4 |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| R | 217 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| D | 0 | 211 | 0 | 1 |
| I | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Research Brief
On Consideration of the Resolution
Bill Analysis
HRES 436, introduced during the 119th Congress, is a resolution that facilitates the consideration of H.R. 1, a bill aimed at enacting budget reconciliation measures as outlined in Title II of House Concurrent Resolution 14. This resolution is a procedural mechanism that sets the stage for the House of Representatives to debate and vote on H.R. 1, which is significant for its potential impact on federal budgetary policies.
The primary focus of H.R. 1 is to implement various fiscal reforms and adjustments that may include changes to tax policy, federal spending, and entitlement programs. While the specific provisions of H.R. 1 are not detailed in HRES 436, reconciliation bills typically aim to align federal spending with budgetary goals established in the concurrent resolution, which can affect a wide range of programs and agencies across the federal government.
Funding and authorities addressed in H.R. 1 could influence numerous sectors, including healthcare, education, and infrastructure, depending on the final provisions adopted. The resolution is designed to streamline the legislative process, allowing for expedited consideration and limiting debate time, which is crucial for timely implementation of budgetary changes.
The beneficiaries of the measures proposed in H.R. 1 will depend on the specific reforms enacted, potentially impacting taxpayers, beneficiaries of federal programs, and state and local governments. Conversely, certain regulations may be imposed on agencies and programs that do not align with the new fiscal directives.
Key timelines associated with HRES 436 include the immediate consideration of H.R. 1 following the resolution’s passage, with the motion to reconsider laid on the table, indicating that the House is moving forward without further debate. This procedural step underscores the urgency and importance of the reconciliation process in shaping federal budgetary policy.
Yea (217)
K
Ken Calvert
S
Scott Franklin
M
Mark Green
L
Lisa McClain
J
John Rutherford
D
David Schweikert
P
Pete Sessions
Nay (211)
J
Jason Crow
L
Lloyd Doggett
J
John Garamendi
J
John Mannion
L
Lucy McBath
E
Eric Swalwell
R
Rashida Tlaib
N
Nydia Velázquez
D
Debbie Wasserman Schultz
