H.J.Res.105 — Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Bureau of Land Management relating to "North Dakota Field Office Record of Decision and Approved Resource Management Plan".
House Roll Call
H.J.Res.105
| Bill | H.J.Res.105 — Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Bureau of Land Management relating to "North Dakota Field Office Record of Decision and Approved Resource Management Plan". |
|---|---|
| Vote question | On Passage |
| Vote type | Yea-and-Nay |
| Result | Passed |
| Totals | Yea 215 / Nay 211 / Present 0 / Not Voting 5 |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| R | 215 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| D | 0 | 210 | 0 | 2 |
| I | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Research Brief
On Passage
Bill Analysis
HJRES 105 is a joint resolution aimed at disapproving a specific rule issued by the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) concerning the “North Dakota Field Office Record of Decision and Approved Resource Management Plan.” This resolution is presented under the authority of Chapter 8 of Title 5 of the United States Code, which allows Congress to review and disapprove certain federal agency rules.
The BLM’s rule in question pertains to land management practices in North Dakota, specifically the approved resource management plan that outlines the use and conservation of public lands in the region. The resolution effectively nullifies this management plan, which could have implications for land use, resource extraction, and environmental protections in North Dakota.
Key funding and authorities involved in this resolution include the BLM, which operates under the Department of the Interior and is responsible for managing public lands. The disapproval of the rule may affect various programs under the BLM’s jurisdiction, including those related to oil and gas leasing, grazing, and conservation efforts.
The primary beneficiaries of this resolution are stakeholders who oppose the BLM’s resource management plan, which may include certain local industries, landowners, and advocacy groups that favor less restrictive land use policies. Conversely, environmental advocates and conservationists may be adversely affected, as the disapproval could lead to less stringent protections for natural resources and habitats.
The latest action on HJRES 105 indicates that it has been presented to the President for consideration. If signed into law, the resolution would take effect immediately, thereby invalidating the BLM’s rule and potentially altering land management practices in North Dakota. The timeline for this process is contingent upon the President’s decision, which is expected to occur within a standard review period following presentation.
Yea (215)
K
Ken Calvert
S
Scott Franklin
L
Lisa McClain
J
John Rutherford
D
David Schweikert
P
Pete Sessions
Nay (211)
J
Jason Crow
L
Lloyd Doggett
J
John Garamendi
J
John Mannion
L
Lucy McBath
R
Rashida Tlaib
N
Nydia Velázquez
D
Debbie Wasserman Schultz
