H.J.Res.131 — Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Bureau of Land Management relating to “Coastal Plain Oil and Gas Leasing Program Record of Decision”
House Roll Call
H.J.Res.131
| Bill | H.J.Res.131 — Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Bureau of Land Management relating to “Coastal Plain Oil and Gas Leasing Program Record of Decision” |
|---|---|
| Vote question | On Passage |
| Vote type | Yea-and-Nay |
| Result | Passed |
| Totals | Yea 217 / Nay 209 / Present 0 / Not Voting 7 |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| R | 214 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
| D | 3 | 208 | 0 | 3 |
| I | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Research Brief
On Passage
Bill Analysis
HJRES 131 is a joint resolution introduced in the 119th Congress aimed at disapproving a specific rule issued by the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) concerning the Coastal Plain Oil and Gas Leasing Program. This rule, part of the broader regulatory framework for oil and gas leasing in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge (ANWR), outlines the BLM’s decision on how to proceed with leasing activities in the Coastal Plain of ANWR, an area of significant ecological and cultural importance.
The resolution utilizes the Congressional Review Act (CRA), which allows Congress to overturn federal regulations by passing a joint resolution of disapproval. If enacted, HJRES 131 would nullify the BLM’s rule, effectively halting any planned oil and gas leasing activities in the Coastal Plain. This action reflects ongoing debates regarding energy development versus environmental protection in sensitive areas.
The primary agency affected by this resolution is the Bureau of Land Management, which oversees federal lands and resources, including oil and gas leasing. The resolution would impact stakeholders including environmental advocacy groups, indigenous communities, and the oil and gas industry. Environmentalists argue that oil drilling poses risks to wildlife and ecosystems, while proponents of drilling assert the need for energy independence and economic benefits.
The resolution’s latest action indicates that it has passed the Senate and a message regarding this action has been sent to the House. The timeline for further consideration in the House remains uncertain, but if passed, the resolution would require the President’s approval or could face a veto. The resolution reflects a critical moment in the ongoing discourse surrounding energy policy, environmental stewardship, and the management of federal lands.
Yea (217)
K
Ken Calvert
S
Scott Franklin
L
Lisa McClain
D
David Schweikert
P
Pete Sessions
Nay (209)
J
Jason Crow
L
Lloyd Doggett
J
John Garamendi
J
John Mannion
L
Lucy McBath
R
Rashida Tlaib
N
Nydia Velázquez
D
Debbie Wasserman Schultz
