H.Res.282 — Providing for consideration of the joint resolution (S.J. Res. 18) disapproving the rule submitted by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection relating to "Overdraft Lending: Very Large Financial Institutions''; providing for consideration of the joint resolution (S.J. Res. 28) disapproving the rule submitted by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection relating to ''Defining Larger Participants of a Market for General-Use Digital Consumer Payment Applications''; providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 1526) to amend title 28, United States Code, to limit the authority of district courts to provide injunctive relief, and for other purposes; providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 22) to amend the National Voter Registration Act of 1993 to require proof of United States citizenship to register an individual to vote in elections for Federal office, and for other purposes; and for other purposes.
House Roll Call
H.Res.282
| Bill | H.Res.282 — Providing for consideration of the joint resolution (S.J. Res. 18) disapproving the rule submitted by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection relating to "Overdraft Lending: Very Large Financial Institutions''; providing for consideration of the joint resolution (S.J. Res. 28) disapproving the rule submitted by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection relating to ''Defining Larger Participants of a Market for General-Use Digital Consumer Payment Applications''; providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 1526) to amend title 28, United States Code, to limit the authority of district courts to provide injunctive relief, and for other purposes; providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 22) to amend the National Voter Registration Act of 1993 to require proof of United States citizenship to register an individual to vote in elections for Federal office, and for other purposes; and for other purposes. |
|---|---|
| Vote question | On Ordering the Previous Question |
| Vote type | Yea-and-Nay |
| Result | Passed |
| Totals | Yea 215 / Nay 213 / Present 0 / Not Voting 3 |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| R | 215 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| D | 0 | 213 | 0 | 0 |
| I | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Research Brief
On Ordering the Previous Question
Bill Analysis
Bill Summary: HRES 282 (119th Congress)
HRES 282 is a resolution that facilitates the consideration of several legislative items, primarily focusing on disapproving specific rules from the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection (BCFP) and addressing voter registration requirements.
Key Provisions:
Disapproval of BCFP Rules:
- The resolution allows for the consideration of two joint resolutions (S.J. Res. 18 and S.J. Res. 28) aimed at disapproving BCFP rules.
- S.J. Res. 18 targets a rule regarding “Overdraft Lending” specifically affecting very large financial institutions, potentially impacting how these institutions manage overdraft fees and consumer protections.
- S.J. Res. 28 addresses the rule defining “Larger Participants” in the market for general-use digital consumer payment applications, which could influence regulatory oversight of digital payment services.
Legislative Amendments:
- The resolution includes provisions for considering H.R. 1526, which seeks to limit district courts’ authority to grant injunctive relief, potentially affecting judicial responses to regulatory enforcement actions.
- It also encompasses H.R. 22, which proposes amendments to the National Voter Registration Act of 1993, mandating proof of U.S. citizenship for individuals registering to vote in federal elections, thereby impacting voter registration processes and eligibility.
Funding/Authorities: While HRES 282 itself does not allocate funding, the associated bills may have implications for regulatory funding and enforcement mechanisms.
Affected Programs/Agencies: The BCFP is directly affected by the disapproval resolutions, while H.R. 22 pertains to the Federal Election Commission and state election offices.
Beneficiaries/Regulated Entities: The bills primarily impact consumers using financial services, large financial institutions, and individuals seeking to register to vote.
Key Timelines: The latest action on HRES 282 was the motion to reconsider, which was laid on the table and agreed to without objection, indicating a procedural step in the legislative process. Further actions on the associated joint resolutions and bills will determine their future status.
Yea (215)
K
Ken Calvert
S
Scott Franklin
M
Mark Green
L
Lisa McClain
J
John Rutherford
D
David Schweikert
P
Pete Sessions
Nay (213)
G
Gerald Connolly
J
Jason Crow
L
Lloyd Doggett
J
John Garamendi
J
John Mannion
L
Lucy McBath
E
Eric Swalwell
R
Rashida Tlaib
N
Nydia Velázquez
D
Debbie Wasserman Schultz
