H.Res.282 — Providing for consideration of the joint resolution (S.J. Res. 18) disapproving the rule submitted by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection relating to "Overdraft Lending: Very Large Financial Institutions''; providing for consideration of the joint resolution (S.J. Res. 28) disapproving the rule submitted by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection relating to ''Defining Larger Participants of a Market for General-Use Digital Consumer Payment Applications''; providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 1526) to amend title 28, United States Code, to limit the authority of district courts to provide injunctive relief, and for other purposes; providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 22) to amend the National Voter Registration Act of 1993 to require proof of United States citizenship to register an individual to vote in elections for Federal office, and for other purposes; and for other purposes.
House Roll Call
H.Res.282
| Bill | H.Res.282 — Providing for consideration of the joint resolution (S.J. Res. 18) disapproving the rule submitted by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection relating to "Overdraft Lending: Very Large Financial Institutions''; providing for consideration of the joint resolution (S.J. Res. 28) disapproving the rule submitted by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection relating to ''Defining Larger Participants of a Market for General-Use Digital Consumer Payment Applications''; providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 1526) to amend title 28, United States Code, to limit the authority of district courts to provide injunctive relief, and for other purposes; providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 22) to amend the National Voter Registration Act of 1993 to require proof of United States citizenship to register an individual to vote in elections for Federal office, and for other purposes; and for other purposes. |
|---|---|
| Vote question | On Agreeing to the Resolution |
| Vote type | Recorded Vote |
| Result | Failed |
| Totals | Yea 206 / Nay 222 / Present 0 / Not Voting 3 |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| R | 206 | 9 | 0 | 3 |
| D | 0 | 213 | 0 | 0 |
| I | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Research Brief
On Agreeing to the Resolution
Bill Analysis
Bill Summary: HRES 282 (119th Congress)
HRES 282 is a resolution that outlines the procedures for considering several legislative measures related to consumer financial protection and voting regulations. The resolution specifically provides for the consideration of two joint resolutions and two bills:
Joint Resolution S.J. Res. 18: This resolution disapproves a rule from the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection (BCFP) concerning “Overdraft Lending: Very Large Financial Institutions.” The rule in question aims to regulate overdraft lending practices by large financial institutions, potentially impacting how these institutions manage consumer accounts and fees.
Joint Resolution S.J. Res. 28: This resolution disapproves another BCFP rule that defines “Larger Participants of a Market for General-Use Digital Consumer Payment Applications.” This rule seeks to establish criteria for identifying significant players in the digital payment space, which could influence regulatory oversight and consumer protections in this rapidly evolving market.
Bill H.R. 1526: This legislation proposes amendments to Title 28 of the United States Code, limiting the authority of district courts to grant injunctive relief. This change could affect how courts handle cases involving federal regulations and consumer protections.
Bill H.R. 22: This bill amends the National Voter Registration Act of 1993 to require proof of U.S. citizenship for individuals registering to vote in federal elections. This measure aims to tighten voter registration processes and could impact voter participation rates.
The resolution facilitates debate and voting on these measures, influencing consumer financial regulations and voting rights. The latest action on HRES 282 involved laying a motion to reconsider on the table, which was agreed to without objection. This indicates that the House has moved forward with the legislative agenda outlined in the resolution. The timeline for further actions on the joint resolutions and bills will depend on subsequent House scheduling and votes.
Yea (206)
K
Ken Calvert
S
Scott Franklin
M
Mark Green
L
Lisa McClain
J
John Rutherford
D
David Schweikert
P
Pete Sessions
Nay (222)
G
Gerald Connolly
J
Jason Crow
L
Lloyd Doggett
J
John Garamendi
J
John Mannion
L
Lucy McBath
E
Eric Swalwell
R
Rashida Tlaib
N
Nydia Velázquez
D
Debbie Wasserman Schultz
