H.Res.294 — Providing for consideration of the joint resolution (S.J. Res. 18) disapproving the rule submitted by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection relating to "Overdraft Lending: Very Large Financial Institutions"; providing for consideration of the joint resolution (S.J. Res. 28) disapproving the rule submitted by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection relating to "Defining Larger Participants of a Market for General-Use Digital Consumer Payment Applications"; providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 1526) to amend title 28, United States Code, to limit the authority of district courts to provide injunctive relief, and for other purposes; providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 22) to amend the National Voter Registration Act of 1993 to require proof of United States citizenship to register an individual to vote in elections for Federal office, and for other purposes; and for other purposes.
House Roll Call
H.Res.294
| Bill | H.Res.294 — Providing for consideration of the joint resolution (S.J. Res. 18) disapproving the rule submitted by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection relating to "Overdraft Lending: Very Large Financial Institutions"; providing for consideration of the joint resolution (S.J. Res. 28) disapproving the rule submitted by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection relating to "Defining Larger Participants of a Market for General-Use Digital Consumer Payment Applications"; providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 1526) to amend title 28, United States Code, to limit the authority of district courts to provide injunctive relief, and for other purposes; providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 22) to amend the National Voter Registration Act of 1993 to require proof of United States citizenship to register an individual to vote in elections for Federal office, and for other purposes; and for other purposes. |
|---|---|
| Vote question | On Agreeing to the Resolution |
| Vote type | Recorded Vote |
| Result | Passed |
| Totals | Yea 213 / Nay 211 / Present 0 / Not Voting 9 |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| R | 213 | 1 | 0 | 6 |
| D | 0 | 210 | 0 | 3 |
| I | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Research Brief
On Agreeing to the Resolution
Bill Analysis
Bill Summary: HRES 294 (119th Congress)
HRES 294 is a resolution that outlines the procedures for the consideration of several significant legislative measures in the U.S. House of Representatives. The resolution specifically provides for the consideration of two joint resolutions and two bills, each addressing distinct regulatory and legislative issues.
Joint Resolutions:
- S.J. Res. 18: This resolution disapproves a rule from the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection (CFPB) regarding “Overdraft Lending” practices at very large financial institutions. The rule aims to regulate how these institutions manage overdraft fees, impacting consumer financial protection.
- S.J. Res. 28: This resolution disapproves another CFPB rule that defines “Larger Participants” in the market for general-use digital consumer payment applications. This regulation is intended to ensure that larger entities in this sector are subject to oversight, thereby enhancing consumer protections.
Bills:
- H.R. 1526: This bill seeks to amend Title 28 of the United States Code to limit the authority of district courts in providing injunctive relief, potentially affecting the judicial landscape regarding federal court interventions.
- H.R. 22: This bill amends the National Voter Registration Act of 1993 to require proof of U.S. citizenship for individuals registering to vote in federal elections, which could significantly impact voter registration processes and access.
Funding/Authorities: The resolution does not allocate funding but facilitates the legislative process for the aforementioned measures.
Agencies Affected: The Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection is directly impacted by the disapproval of its rules, while the Department of Justice may be involved in the implications of H.R. 1526.
Beneficiaries/Regulated Entities: Consumers utilizing financial services, particularly those affected by overdraft fees and digital payment applications, will be impacted by the resolutions. Additionally, the voter registration changes will affect individuals seeking to register for federal elections.
Key Timelines: The latest action on HRES 294 was a motion to reconsider, which was laid on the table and agreed to without objection, indicating a procedural advancement in the legislative process.
Yea (213)
K
Ken Calvert
S
Scott Franklin
M
Mark Green
L
Lisa McClain
J
John Rutherford
D
David Schweikert
P
Pete Sessions
Nay (211)
G
Gerald Connolly
J
Jason Crow
L
Lloyd Doggett
J
John Garamendi
J
John Mannion
L
Lucy McBath
E
Eric Swalwell
R
Rashida Tlaib
N
Nydia Velázquez
D
Debbie Wasserman Schultz
