H.Res.1009 — Providing for consideration of the bills H.R. 6945 and H.R. 6359; and providing for consideration of the joint resolution H.J. Res. 140
House Roll Call
H.Res.1009
| Bill | H.Res.1009 — Providing for consideration of the bills H.R. 6945 and H.R. 6359; and providing for consideration of the joint resolution H.J. Res. 140 |
|---|---|
| Vote question | On Ordering the Previous Question |
| Vote type | Yea-and-Nay |
| Result | Passed |
| Totals | Yea 212 / Nay 210 / Present 0 / Not Voting 9 |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| R | 212 | 0 | 0 | 6 |
| D | 0 | 210 | 0 | 3 |
| I | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Research Brief
On Ordering the Previous Question
Bill Analysis
H.Res. 1009 is a House procedural measure (a “rule”) that sets the terms for floor consideration of three separate measures: H.R. 6945, H.R. 6359, and H.J. Res. 140. It does not itself change substantive law, appropriate funds, or create programs; instead, it governs how the House will debate and amend those bills.
H.R. 6945 – TANF funds and pregnancy centers
- Subject: Amends part A of title IV of the Social Security Act (Temporary Assistance for Needy Families, TANF).
- Purpose: Clarifies that states may use TANF funds for “pregnancy centers” (often crisis pregnancy centers) and related services.
- Effect: Affects state TANF agencies and low‑income pregnant individuals and families. It would formally authorize or reinforce states’ discretion to direct TANF dollars to these centers, potentially influencing the mix of services (e.g., counseling, material support) funded under TANF.
- Regulation/beneficiaries: States as TANF administrators; pregnancy centers as eligible service providers; TANF‑eligible families as indirect beneficiaries.
H.R. 6359 – Information for pregnant students
- Subject: Higher education and Title IV‑participating institutions.
- Purpose: Requires colleges and universities that receive federal student aid funds to disseminate information on the rights, accommodations, and resources available to pregnant students.
- Effect: Imposes a new information‑disclosure obligation on institutions of higher education; benefits pregnant students by mandating clearer notice of protections (e.g., under Title IX) and available supports.
- Regulated entities: Institutions of higher education; beneficiaries are pregnant students and potentially parenting students.
H.J. Res. 140 – Disapproval of BLM land withdrawal rule
- Subject: Congressional Review Act (5 U.S.C. ch. 8) disapproval of a Bureau of Land Management rule implementing Public Land Order No. 7917, which withdraws certain federal lands in Cook, Lake, and St. Louis Counties, Minnesota from mineral or other uses.
- Purpose: If enacted, would nullify that BLM rule and prevent issuance of a substantially similar rule absent new statutory authority.
- Affected parties: BLM; mining and other land‑use interests; environmental and tribal stakeholders in the affected Minnesota counties.
Timelines: H.Res. 1009 places these measures on the House Calendar (No. 55) and, once adopted, would control the duration and structure of debate and amendment for each item during floor consideration in the 119th Congress.
Yea (212)
K
Ken Calvert
S
Scott Franklin
L
Lisa McClain
J
John Rutherford
D
David Schweikert
P
Pete Sessions
Nay (210)
J
Jason Crow
L
Lloyd Doggett
J
John Garamendi
J
John Mannion
L
Lucy McBath
R
Rashida Tlaib
N
Nydia Velázquez
D
Debbie Wasserman Schultz
