H.Res.1009 — Providing for consideration of the bills H.R. 6945 and H.R. 6359; and providing for consideration of the joint resolution H.J. Res. 140

House Roll Call

H.Res.1009

Roll 35 • Congress 119, Session 2 • Jan 21, 2026 2:04 PM • Result: Passed

← Back to roll call list • View bill page • Clerk record • API source

BillH.Res.1009 — Providing for consideration of the bills H.R. 6945 and H.R. 6359; and providing for consideration of the joint resolution H.J. Res. 140
Vote questionOn Agreeing to the Resolution
Vote typeRecorded Vote
ResultPassed
TotalsYea 213 / Nay 210 / Present 0 / Not Voting 8
PartyYeaNayPresentNot Voting
R213005
D021003
I0000

Research Brief

On Agreeing to the Resolution

Bill Analysis

H.Res. 1009 is a House procedural measure (a “rule”) that sets the terms for floor consideration of three separate measures: H.R. 6945, H.R. 6359, and H.J. Res. 140. It does not itself change substantive law, authorize programs, or appropriate funds; instead, it governs how the House will debate and amend those bills.

  1. H.R. 6945 – TANF funds and pregnancy centers

    • Amends part A of title IV of the Social Security Act (Temporary Assistance for Needy Families, TANF).
    • Clarifies that states may use TANF block grant funds for “pregnancy centers” (often crisis pregnancy centers) and related services.
    • Affects state human services agencies administering TANF, and indirectly pregnancy centers and low‑income pregnant individuals who may receive services funded through TANF.
    • The rule will specify debate time, amendment structure (e.g., closed or structured rule), and procedures for motions.

  2. H.R. 6359 – Information for pregnant students

    • Requires institutions of higher education participating in federal student aid programs to disseminate information on:
      • Rights of pregnant and parenting students (e.g., under Title IX).
      • Available accommodations and campus/community resources.
    • Affects colleges and universities (administrative compliance obligations), and pregnant/parenting students (access to information).
    • The rule again sets debate length, amendment process, and motion procedures.

  3. H.J. Res. 140 – Disapproval of BLM land withdrawal rule

    • Uses the Congressional Review Act (5 U.S.C. ch. 8) to disapprove a Bureau of Land Management rule implementing Public Land Order No. 7917, which withdraws specified federal lands in Cook, Lake, and St. Louis Counties, Minnesota from certain uses.
    • If enacted, the rule would be nullified and BLM barred from issuing a substantially similar rule without new statutory authority.
    • Affects BLM, potentially mining, logging, or other land‑use interests, and environmental and tribal stakeholders in the affected counties.

Timelines and status:
H.Res. 1009 was placed on the House Calendar (Calendar No. 55), positioning it for floor consideration. Once adopted by the House, its terms immediately govern when and how the three underlying measures are debated and voted on.

View bill source • Clerk record • API record

Yea (213)

K
Ken Calvert

CA • R • Aye

S
Scott Franklin

FL • R • Aye

L
Lisa McClain

MI • R • Aye

J
John Rutherford

FL • R • Aye

D
David Schweikert

AZ • R • Aye

P
Pete Sessions

TX • R • Aye

Nay (210)

J
Jason Crow

CO • D • No

L
Lloyd Doggett

TX • D • No

J
John Garamendi

CA • D • No

J
John Mannion

NY • D • No

L
Lucy McBath

GA • D • No

R
Rashida Tlaib

MI • D • No

N
Nydia Velázquez

NY • D • No

D
Debbie Wasserman Schultz

FL • D • No

Not Voting (8)

E
Eric Swalwell

CA • D • Not Voting